![]() The file looks like: pick dae2691 add amazing feature squash 3491879 add test squash 3fedbd5 fix typo # Commands: # p, pick = use commit # r, reword = use commit, but edit the commit message # e, edit = use commit, but stop for amending # s, squash = use commit, but meld into previous commit # f, fixup = like "squash", but discard this commit's log message # x, exec = run command (the rest of the line) using shell Put squash keyword in-place of pick in front of commits. Put pick keyword with only one commit, that will be there in final history. Now, we want to have all the commits into one. And, below that, there are various options. Note the default: pick keyword in front of each commit. See example below: pick 8472as3 add Test bug-1 pick 92731cf add feature description pick asf4234 bug fix # Commands: # p, pick = use commit # r, reword = use commit, but edit the commit message # e, edit = use commit, but stop for amending # s, squash = use commit, but meld into previous commit # f, fixup = like "squash", but discard this commit's log message # x, exec = run command (the rest of the line) using shell This will open up an editor (vim kind) and few options. # Switch to your feature branch git checkout FeatureBranch # start interactive rebasing # in this case, our main branch is master git rebase -i master Interactive rebasing is used to manipulate your history. We will use an interactive way of doing git-rebase. git push -f Method-2 Using Git rebase with interactive option If there are no conflicts, this will work. # Switch to your feature branch git checkout FeatureBranch # in this case, our main branch is master git rebase master Git merges and git rebase both are used to integrate your changes into the main branch. Method-1 Using Git rebaseĪpart from git merge, there is a git rebase option too. So that, reviewer will only see single commit containing all the file changes. This post is about create a PR without historical commits. So, reviewer would want to cleanup your commit history so that only one commit is visible in the PR. But, anyone can easily forget that because this option is not enabled by default. Although, there is a “Squash and Merge” option. And there is no benefit of incorporating that history into Master branch. Reviewer will see the intermediate commits in your PR. But, when you create a Pull Request (PR) for that merge. You would want to commit that in Master branch. When the feature work is done on that branch. Consider you have created a branch from Master branch, and did few commits as we normally do. If you working on a GitHub project in a team.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |